CFTC Moves to Block Utah’s Crackdown on Kalshi Sports Prediction Markets

The federal government is escalating its fight with Utah over sports prediction markets, asking a federal judge to stop the state from pursuing criminal and civil enforcement actions against Kalshi. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Department of Justice filed an emergency motion on October 29, 2026, seeking to prevent Utah from applying its gambling laws to federally regulated event contracts.

The request follows Utah’s decision to file 14 criminal charges against Kalshi and its co-founders, creating a potentially significant legal showdown over whether states can prohibit sports prediction markets operating under federal oversight.

CFTC Seeks Emergency Injunction Against Utah

The CFTC and federal government initially sued Utah on October 26, challenging the state’s efforts to restrict Kalshi’s operations. Three days later, federal attorneys requested a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction that would halt Utah’s enforcement proceedings.

Federal regulators argue that the Commodity Exchange Act gives the CFTC exclusive authority over event contracts traded on federally designated exchanges. Under that interpretation, Utah cannot independently classify those contracts as illegal gambling products.

The proposed injunction would extend beyond Kalshi and could prevent Utah from pursuing similar investigations or enforcement actions against other CFTC-regulated exchanges and their affiliated businesses.

Utah Files 13 Felony Charges Against Kalshi

Utah Attorney General Derek Brown filed criminal charges against Kalshi and co-founders Tarek Mansour and Luana Lopes Lara on October 28, alleging the platform illegally promoted online gambling.

The charges include 13 felony counts and one misdemeanor, stemming partly from an undercover investigation in which a state investigator placed sports-related wagers through Kalshi.

According to Associated Press reporting, Utah maintains that federal registration does not exempt prediction market operators from state gambling restrictions.

Utah has consistently opposed legalized sports wagering, and Utah sports betting laws do not authorize domestic sportsbooks or online sports gambling.

State officials argue that contracts tied to football, baseball, and other sporting events function like traditional wagers regardless of how operators describe them.

Federal and State Governments Disagree Over Betting Authority

The central dispute concerns whether sports prediction contracts should be regulated as financial derivatives or gambling products. Kalshi maintains that its customers trade event contracts with one another through a federally regulated exchange, distinguishing its business model from conventional sportsbooks.

Utah disagrees, arguing that allowing customers to risk money on sporting outcomes constitutes gambling under state law. The disagreement has implications extending far beyond Utah. Across the country, state sports betting regulations establish licensing requirements, consumer protections, and restrictions that conventional sportsbooks must follow.

If prediction market operators can offer comparable sports contracts under federal oversight, states could struggle to enforce those requirements against the platforms.

What Happens Next in the Kalshi Court Battle?

U.S. District Judge Robert Shelby has scheduled a November 6 hearing-related status conference to address the federal government’s lawsuit and emergency motion. As of November 2, the court has not granted the requested injunction.

The upcoming proceedings could help determine whether Utah can continue pursuing its criminal prosecution while federal regulators challenge the state’s authority.

A ruling favoring the CFTC could strengthen prediction market operators’ arguments against state restrictions, while a decision supporting Utah could encourage similar enforcement actions elsewhere.

With competing interpretations of federal commodities law and state gambling authority, the dispute could eventually require resolution by higher federal courts, potentially including the U.S. Supreme Court.

author avatar
Samantha Gordon
Samantha Gordon has been an author at SportsBetting.legal for several years now. She works as Managing Editor in addition to supporting the current writing staff, but her educational background is in Marketing and Business Administration. Samantha also provides marketing support and oversees data management and bill tracking for US state-regulated sports betting legislation. Since she was a young girl, history was Samantha’s favorite subject in school. Something about following how a true story unfolded always fascinated her. At Sportsbetting.legal, she has a front row seat in the rapidly changing legal landscape of the US sports betting market as she observes history in the making right before her very eyes – and she feels that this kind of makes it special that she’s a part of it all. Samantha comes from a mixed ethnic background heavily influenced by Asian culture. Growing up, she was always inspired by pioneer women of color who broke barriers and norms to make way for their ideas and dreams. In her spare time, Samantha loves to watch old movies and interviews with influential actors, activists, athletes, and artists who were not scared to cut their own cloth. As one could probably guess from this and her favorite sport, Verena Mei is undeniably her favorite rally driver. Currently, Samantha lives in Tallahassee FL after relocating to work alongside Sportsbetting.legal. However, she regularly travels back home to visit her family and reconnect after being away for long periods for work.